| 2008-2009 MCCDE Annual Report
download here
Activities and Findings
Executive Summary
In August 2008, a new PI was assigned to this research grant due
to the original PI leaving Purdue University. The project currently
remains on schedule and on budget. The research team has bi-weekly
telephone conference calls to discuss project tasks and deliverables.
Including the PI transition meeting in August 2008, the project
team has met in person three times since then (at Fox Valley, Sinclair,
and Purdue) and will likely meet in person at least two additional
times before the project end date. The project will have multiple
objectives completed by the end date of August 2009. However, further
dissemination is necessary. Currently the project budget for year
3 has been allocated. In light of increased community college partner
participation and responsibility with a new PI being placed on this
project, the new PI increased each community college partner’s
allotment of overall project funds by $5000. In addition, it is
likely that the overall project budget will be slightly under spent
when the project period ends. The team then intends to submit a
no-cost extension to finish spending down available resources, including
the participant stipend funds within the budget. The project has
a slight surplus of those funds at this time sine we have only recently
begun making concrete plans for and spending participant support
dollars.
A major component of this grant project was to create curriculum
materials for comprehensive design education. These materials would
then be integrated into existing coursework at the partner institutions
and be disseminated to the general public through a series of workshops
to be held starting in summer 2009 and in the future . The curriculum
modules have been completed, and the team is now in the process
of creating five integrated learning activities (ILAs) to provide
users of these curriculum modules with a way to tie the curriculum
modules together in a meaningful way. The ILAs have been completed
and have been sent to the project evaluator (Vijay Srinivasan, Columbia
University – formerly of IBM) for his feedback. In addition
to the curriculum development, the project team will be conducting
three faculty development workshops in summer 2009 to disseminate
and assess the new curriculum. These workshops will targeted primarily
at high school and community college faculty in technology or pre-engineering
programs. The workshops will be held at Butler Community College
(June 16-17, 2009), Purdue University (July 7-10, 2009) and the
NSF Hi-TECH Conference (July 19-22, 2009).
The following list includes the major milestones for the remainder
of the project:
• March/April team meeting – site and date to be determined
• ILAs completed – April 1
• Send ILAs to external evaluator – April 15
• Review back from external evaluator – May 15
• Workshop at Butler Community College – June 16-17,
2009
• Workshop at Purdue University – July 7-10, 2009
• Workshop at NSF Hi-TECH Conference – July 19-22, 2009
• August team meeting – site to be determined
• Additional team meetings in August 2009, November 2009,
February 2010, and May 2010
In addition to the workshops mentioned above, the following list
is a compilation of course titles from the partnering institutions
that demonstrates the breadth of coverage these curriculum materials
have within our respective institutions. Similar institutions would
likely derive similar benefits from those seen here. Courses at
the partner institutions served by the activities on this grant
include the following:
• 10-606-115 Design of Tooling
• 10-606-119 Statics and Strength of Materials
• 10-606-111 Design Problems
• 10-606-121 Elements of Machine Design
• 10-606-124 Intro to Product Design & Rapid Prototyping
• 10-420-145 Manufacturing Processes, Cold-Machining
• 10-457-103 Manufacturing Processes, Hot-Welding
• OLS 274 Applied Leadership
• OLS 284 Leadership Principles
• OLS 328 Principles Of International Management
• OLS 365 Leading Virtual Teams
• OLS 456 Leadership In A Global Environment
• CGT 116 Geometric Modeling For Visualization And Communication
• CGT 226 Introduction To Constraint-Based Modeling
• CGT 423 Product Data Management
• CADD101 Parametric Modeling Fundamentals
• CADD102 Mechanical Detailing Applications
• CADD204 CADD Product Design Applications
• MDES 110 Introduction to Manufacturing Design
• DRFT 110 Advanced Drafting
• MECH 281 Manufacturing Capstone
• ETD 101 Introduction to Engineering Design
• ETD 297 Special topics - Guitar Design and manufacturing
• ETD 110 Engineering Design and Development
• CAT 258 Project Management
• OTS 302 Workforce Supervision.
Specifically at Butler Community College this semester, we have
experienced the following successes:
• Integrated guitar-project content into Advanced Drafting
(DRFT-110 ) course offering. 13 students impacted by Integrated
Learning Activities and curriculum module content created as part
of MCCDE grant.
• Manufacturing Capstone (MECH-281) student created tool paths
and CNC code directly from guitar body solid model using CAMWorks
software, developed process plan for machining, and investigated/selected
appropriate cutting tools and fixturing methods.
• Created three-credit technology elective based on MCCDE
guitar project/curriculum (DRFT-165). This course to be offered
in Fall 2009 semester. Likely impact is 15 students.
• Conducted collaborative design and rapid prototyping project
with Northhampton Community College (PA) based on guitar headstock
designs. Ten total students impacted.
• May 8, 2009 – Plant visit to C.F. Martin Guitar (Nazareth,
PA) – jointly with Northhampton Community College. Two faculty
members and ten students impacted.
Specifically at Purdue this semester, we have experienced the following
successes:
• Modules used in product graphics standards course. Impacted
35 students
• Modules used in product data management course. Impacted
20 students
Research and Education Activities
During Year 3 of this project a major focus for grant activities
was towards dissemination and evaluation. Curriculum development
played a lesser role. To that end, the team developed six integrated
learning activities to be used with the curriculum models that were
developed in Years 1 and 2. The curriculum modules were developed
based on competencies endorsed by the Society of Manufacturing Engineers,
the focus of which was towards integrated skills development, project
management, and communication skills. The competencies were evaluated
for applicability to this project by the industry advisory board
for the Purdue PLM Center of Excellence. When that was complete,
the external evaluator assessed the curriculum modules. The results
are described below. The external evaluator is now in the process
of assessing the integrated learning activities.
A major recruitment and dissemination activity for Year 3 is the
development of faculty workshops to present the curriculum modules
for use and evaluation, as well as the integrated learning activities.
The external evaluator will also assess the workshop that will be
held at Purdue University in July 2009. Additional recruitment and
assessment activities, as well as activities and classes for students
and industry engagement, are detailed in the Major Findings section
below.
Major Findings
The project team has been gathering assessment data since the fall
academic term of 2007. Data has been gathered in multiple ways.
Students in selected courses at the partner institutions have completed
surveys assessing their understanding of the curriculum content
developed during this project that has been used in these courses.
In addition, our industry advisory board has provided an assessment
of the competencies selected as learning outcomes for this project.
A third assessment measure that has been conducted has come from
our external evaluator. He has provided substantial feedback on
the curriculum content developed for this project. His is in the
process of assessing the integrated learning activities in preparation
of the summer workshops, and he will provide an evaluation of the
participant workshop to be held at Purdue University in summer 2009.
Following is a summary of formative evaluation to this point, and
a summary of he external evaluator’s assessment of the comprehensive
design learning modules.
Formative Evaluation of the Midwest Coalition for Comprehensive
Design Education Project
MCCDE Project’s evaluation plan had both formative and summative
elements that were based on the project’s goals and objectives.
The main goal of the project was to implement comprehensive design
& manufacturing curricula for the associate and baccalaureate
degrees, and continuing education certification.
Evaluation Methodology
The evaluation framework of the project was Outcomes-based Evaluation
(OBE). The evaluation focused on the measurement of results or impact.
It identified observations that demonstrated the impact the project
has had on the participants (McNamara, 1994). Data about the identified
performance indicators was systematically collected and used to show
the extent to which a project had achieved its objectives (Patton,
1997). The evaluation allowed the project to become more accountable
thereby increasing its likelihood of retaining or increase funding,
develop and justify budgets. Through the evaluation allowed the project
to increase internal efficiency by tracking its inputs and outputs
and targeting effective services for expansion and prepare long-range
plans. OBE was an effective way of demonstrating the program for replication
(Kirkpatrick; 1996, 1998).
Evaluation Questions
The evaluation sought to answer the following questions:
1. To what extent has the project met its objectives?
2. How effective was the curriculum at developing and promoting
identified and validated essential skills in fulltime students and
part-time continuing education students?
3. Were the curriculum products effectively packaged for marketing
and dissemination?
Evaluation Design
To determine the impact of the program, elements of a logic model
were evaluated. Table 1 shows aspects of the project that were evaluated.
The evaluation model starts of by addressing the situation and the
priorities. It was also important to take into account the assumptions
and external factors that may be affecting the inputs, outputs,
and outcomes.
Situation: Shortage of skilled workers in Advanced
Manufacturing
Priorities: Module development and competency validation
Assumptions: Continued support from funding agency,
Support from partner institutions, and Sustained need by industry
for Advanced manufacturing competencies
External Factors include the Economic forces, Globalization,
and other Environmental factors
Formative Evaluation Plan
The formative evaluation involves the assessing the extent to which
the Midwest Coalition for Comprehensive Design Education Project
had been successful in meeting its originally stated objectives.
This stage of the evaluation was mainly descriptive. The formative
evaluation sought to answer the following questions:
1. Have goals been clearly established? What aspects of the system
are expected to improve student learning and motivation and why?
2. How was learner analysis being used to inform the design of the
system?
3. How was technology being selected to enhance learning?
4. To what degree were the courses effective?
5. What features were contributing to enhanced learning?
Table 1: Midwest Coalition for Comprehensive Design Education
Project Logic

Assessment Design Matrix
The Project Logic Model was used to develop Assessment Design Matrix
(Table 2) that identifies metrics that were used in data collection
from the five collaborating institutions.
Table 2: Assessment Design Matrix
Curriculum Development Process
Each institution in the partnership designed one or more courses
to share and institutionalize. Courses were developed using a module
templates (See appendix 1) in a common standard that will eventually
facilitate sharing within partner institutions and other interested
parties through available digitally at the projects website, http://e-create.org
. Each module will be a self-standing unit, containing the basic
aspects for teaching content and develop skills, in addition to
suggesting educational activities and assessment methods. The templates
were a PowerPoint presentation and a Teaching Notes outline.
Partner institutions identified the following as the appropriate
outcomes for a the design education program.
1. Apply mathematical and natural science principles into the product
design process
2. Ability to apply fundamental engineering principles for effective
solution of practical problems in the product realization process.
3. Ability to analyze and develop intelligent electromechanical
systems .
4. Apply relevant technology tools within the product realization
environment.
5. Develop awareness of the professional and ethical responsibilities
for sustainable design, in order to ascertain the impacts of the
engineering solution on the global society and environment.
6. Ability to work within a multi-disciplinary collaborative product
realization team.
7. Effectively communicate using written, oral and visual means.
8. Demonstrate commitment to continuous improvement and education
through independent experiences.
9. Ability to capture customer requirements and generate appropriate
design specifications based on market needs and constraints.
10. Apply program objectives to collaboratively develop design solutions
in a capstone environment.
11. Validate compliance to design specification through prototyping
and testing.
Integrate project management best practices throughout all phases
of product design and development
12. Integrate project management best practices throughout all phases
of product design and development
The following courses were identified for curriculum development.
The institution that was responsible for the development is shown
in parenthesis.
Collaborative Design (Sinclair)
Design for Assembly (Mott)
Design for Manufacturability (Sinclair)
Design for Reliability (Butler)
Digital Manufacturing (Purdue)
Leadership and Management in a Global Environment (Purdue)
Product Data Management (Purdue)
Project Management (Purdue)
Prototyping (Fox Valley)
Sustainable Design (Butler)
Systems and Process Simulation (Mott)
Teamwork and Virtual Teams (Fox Valley)
ASSESSMENT TOOLS
The most critical phase of the evaluation was the assessment of
project outcomes. The following tools used to assess perceptions
of faculty and industrial partners of the project and the measurement
of students learning gains. :
1. Student Learning Gains Survey
2. Faculty Survey from the three institutions discussed their experiences
and their perceptions as to what made
the partnership a success.
3. Validation of competencies
4. Workshop survey
External Evaluator.
The external evaluator who had experience in manufacturing engineering
and was familiar with the work evaluated the project’s deliverables.
He participated in partnership meetings, and evaluated the modules
and integrated learning modules.
Assessment of Teaching and learning Modules.
The external evaluator assessed the relevance and applicability
of the teaching modules developed at the five institutions. (See
appendix for MCCDE Reviewer Feedback Guidelines Learning Modules).
For each module he
• Made comment and explained briefly with examples to clarify
comments.
• Offered suggestions for minor changes.
• For larger changes, offered alternatives or options on how
to improve the document.
Below are comments the evaluator mad e on each of the following
modules.
1. Product Engineering – Design for Manufacturability,
assembly & reliability, sustainable designs.
Comments:
• It would be useful to discuss disassembly (along with assembly),
and its link to product disposal and reuse/repair (end of life and
sustainability issues).
• Some more discussion on Failure Mode and Effect Analysis
(FMEA) and Root Cause Analysis (RCA) would be appropriate.
• The sustainable design module is a bit soft – it is
understandable as we are learning about these issues.
2. Manufacturing Engineering – Systems/Process Simulation,
Prototyping.
Comments:
• The title of this area is ‘manufacturing engineering’
– it would be a good idea to have a module on manufacturing
technologies.
• The ratings above apply to the two modules presented in
this area.
3. Information Technology – Collaborative Design,
Product Data Management.
Comments:
• It might be useful to add some material on ERP systems as
part of the Information Technology.
• Manufacturing Execution Systems (MES) can be covered either
in this area or in the Manufacturing Engineering area.
4. Business Environment – Globalization, Project
Management, Teamwork/Virtual Teams.
Comments:
• This is probably a big area, and more modules may be needed.
It might be a good idea to use some case studies – this might
be the most effective way to teach the business issues and environments.
Validation of Competencies
Industry partners were solicited to provide input on the competencies
identified for a Product Lifecycle Baccalaureate and Associate degree
programs. See appendix for the Competencies Validation Survey for
Manufacturing Technology Graduates Working in Product Lifecycle
Management. Results of the survey will be included in the final
report.
Results
New minors and formal options in Product Realization and Design/Manufacturing
have been started at each academic partner.
A total of approximately 600 students participated in identified
MCCDE courses and projects during year 2 of the 3-year project.
Over 15 faculty participated.
Nearly twelve industry partners have provided $300,000 in parallel
research funding and in-kind services.
Collaboration
The Guitar project was developed in a collaborative digital-based
environment. Features of the collaborative project included the
application of product lifecycle principles to the construction
of the guitar. Guitar workshops were held at Purdue University in
the summer of 2007 and 2008.
To facilitate the cooperation these Collaboration Tools were used:
• Teamcenter Community
• Skype
• Adobe Connect
Partner Institutions used a variety of software solutions in their
collaborative design activities (Table 3).
Assessment of Student Learning Gains
Appendix
Demographics
Fifty nine students participated in the Assessment of Student learning
Gains Survey. Most of the participants (60%) were from Purdue University.
Table 4: Distribution of respondents by College

Eighty-nine percent of the respondents were male with only 6 females.
The majority of the respondents were in the age group 20-29 years
old. There was one participant who was over 65 years. Table 5 show
the distribution of respondents by age.
Table 5: Distribution by Age

Although they were not many minorities participating in the survey,
a much higher percentage was in the program. Table 6 shows the distribution
by race of the respondents.
Table 6: Distribution of respondents by Race
The majority of the respondents were seeking an associates or baccalaureate
degree. About 8% of the respondents were seeking graduate degrees
(Table 7). Over 50% of the respondents were seniors with about 12%
part-time students.
Table 7: Distribution of Respondents by Class Year

The following table summarizes the respondents profile of the surveys,
percentages show the proportion of respondents that felt that the
program courses helped them develop the following skills and knowledge
in the areas listed below
- 62% Applying math principles
- 48.9% Applying science concepts
- 76% Solving problems
- 74% collaboratively develop design solutions
- 54.6% Compliance to design specification through testing
- 15.9% Writing papers
- 48.9% Understand how ideas in this class relate to other PLM
- 34.1% Finding trends in data
- 72.6% Understanding relevance to real world
- 43.2% Appreciating PLM
- 60% Learn independent as a life long learner
- 52% Working effectively with others
- 78.5% Ability to think through a problem
- 80.4 Confidence in your ability to work in class
- 56.9% Feeling comfortable with complex ideas
- 64.7% Enthusiasm for subject
- 68.7% Professional ethics and social responsibilities
Faculty and Staff Survey
Faculty and staff involved in the project were solicited to provide
input on the project See Appendix for faculty survey). The survey
elicited responses on the following broad categories.
- Participation Benefits
- Participation Costs.
- Satisfaction with the Partnership.
- Sense of ownership.
- Partner institution commitment.
- Curriculum Development
- Project Activities and Outcomes
- Partnership interaction
- Flow of information
- Organizational Barriers
- Perceived Effectiveness.
- Project Progress
The results of the final survey will be available in the final
report. The respondents to date were too few to provide valid statistics.
However, based on the limited responses, it would appear that there
was some consensus that the project achieved most of its objectives
and that institutions and individuals on the project had benefitted
from participation. There were some concerns about decision making
and participation by students.
Training & Development and Outreach Activities
As a dissemination mechanism for this ATE grant, the project team
intends to conduct three workshops in summer 2009. They include
the following locations:
• Butler County Community College: June 16 – 17, 2009.
Primarily focused on high school and community college faculty to
have an opportunity to be exposed to comprehensive design curricula.
• Purdue University: July 7 – 10, 2009. Open to all
faculty levels and will run concurrently with a guitar-building
workshop, which is the learning metaphor for our instructional materials
created on this project.
• NSF Hi-TECH Conference: July 19 – 22, 2009. Open to
faculty of all levels. Includes a half-day workshop prior to the
conference to engage faculty on online collaborative design techniques.
Faculty will leave these workshops with curriculum materials and
functional guitar hardware (some of which they have created and
manufactured) to take back to their classrooms.
Given the mission of each partner institution, industry engagement
and workforce development efforts relative to this grant project
have been strong. Each institution has contributed significantly
to its academic mission during participation in the grant.
Fox Valley Technical College delivers 80 programs to over 50,000
students each year. FVTC has a successful track of collaboration
and joint partnerships to meet education and industry needs, particularly
to business and industry. More than 1,700 employers and 21,000 employees
are served each year, with 72% located within the district, 20%
outside the district but still in Wisconsin, and the remaining 8%
out of state. Customers range from large multi-national corporations
to small-and medium-sized businesses to governmental agencies and
schools. Employer-requested training typically occurs at the employer’s
site and is customized to meet their unique needs. FVTC contract
revenue generation in recent years was over $7.4 million or over
20% of the total state revenue in Wisconsin Technical College system.
FabTech Service Technicain Training Center on Fox Valley Technical
College (Oshkosh) Campus FABTECH offers Caterpillar-specific service
technician career tracks: Rental, Engine, Construction Equipment,
and Electric Power Generation (EPG)/Marine Engine. Students are
trained by experienced FVTC instructors and have the opportunity
to work on current model Caterpillar equipment, engines and generators
using the latest tools and advanced diagnostic technology. http://www.fabco.com/fabtech/default.htm
At Mott Community College, we offeedr the Design for Assembly module
as an option in a PLM Certificate program that we developed using
Dept. of Labor funds. This initiative is focused on small and medium
size companies being encouraged (or directed) to implement a PLM
strategy -- either in part or in whole. We have developed a 2 day
overview (high level) that breaks the PLM enterprise down into four
manageable sections (Concept, Design Development, Process Design,
Manufacturing/Service/End of Life) designed as a type of strategic
definition. Following this overview we are offering a series of
"tactical" PLM components, Design Intent and Parametric
Modeling, Design for Assembly/Manufacturing, Supply Chain, Overview
of CAE, and eventually a 4 day discrete event process planning product.
We are developing this material as part of the Southeast Michigan
Community College Consortium (SMC3) -- meaning that we will share
this content with 8 other colleges and it may be rolled out across
SE MI.
Butler County Community College's Business and Industry Training
Institute (BITI) provides customized training to employees of local
companies and organizations. BITI is a partner in the Workforce
& Economic Development Network of Pennsylvania (WEDnetPA) WEDnetPA
is an alliance of 33 educational providers across Pennsylvania that
acts as the delivery mechanism for the Commonwealth's Guaranteed
Free Training (GFT) program. As a WEDnetPA partner, BCCC serves
as the point of contact for businesses in its service area accessing
GFT funds. BITI also coordinates a variety of technical offerings
to support the apprenticeship programs of local manufacturing operations.
In addition, the College's Office of Professional Education &
Certificate Programs coordinates a variety of certificate programs,
including a 12-week Non-Destructive Testing/Inspection Technologies
certificate. NDT methods trained include: Visual Testing (VT), Liquid
Penetrant Testing (PT), Magnetic Particle Testing (MT), Radiographic
Testing (RT), and Ultrasonic Testing (UT). The training program
meets or exceeds the guidelines or requirements of the American
Society for Nondestructive Testing (ASNT) documents SNT-TC-1A, CP-189
and NAS 410. Most of the companies impacted by the College's workforce
development training programs are small- to medium-sized operations.
Business and Industry Training Summary for Butler Community College
includes:
• Trained 1,154 incumbent workers through a variety of workforce
development offerings, including: AutoCAD, Solidworks, blueprint
reading, basic wiring, industrial communications, physics and industrial
mechanics.
• Managed $345,000 in WEDnetPA grants to deploy training for
local manufacturing businesses.
• Local businesses served: General Electric Transportation
Systems, Butler County Manufacturing Consortium, AK Steel, Penn
United Technologies, II-VI, Oberg Industries, Cygnus Manufacturing
Company, TW Phillips, IDL Worldwide, Bear Metallurgical, Wise Machines,
Alpin Surgical Specialties, Butler Technologies, Napco, Preservation
Technologies, Sonneborn, TRACO, Standard Bent Glass, Pulva Corp.,
and Penna Flame Industries.
• Deployed technical courses as part of the established apprenticeship
programs of local manufacturing companies, including Cygnus Manufacturing
Company and AK Steel-Butler Works.
• December 3, 2008 – BC3 Board of Directors Meeting
• February 9, 2009 – Local Legislator’s Luncheon
(Butler County and PA State reps) hosted at BC3
• April 16, 2009 – Local community talk show on WISR
radio (1 hour discussion)
• February 20-21, 2009 – National Engineers Week event
(~5,400 students, teachers and parents reached)
• March 24, 2009 – Butler Intermediate High School presentation
(~600 students)
• April 29, 2009 – BC3 Annual Drafting Contest (~200
students and 21 teachers impacted)
At Sinclair Community College, we have two industry engagement
and workforce development activities currently. Currently PDM techniques
are being applied to a project of aircraft/ Helicopter prototyping
that we are doing for Rolls Royce via Phoenix formations which does
trade show exhibits.
At Purdue University, we have engaged in three substantial activities
relative to this grant project and workforce development. The first
is a Product Lifecycle Management (PLM) Certificate Program with
The Boeing Company. It has the potential to involve up to 5000 incumbent
engineers over the next 3 years. We also intend to develop a series
of PLM-oriented seminars (1 or 2 days in duration) to offer management-level
education that would help companies develop strategy around and
understanding of PLM-related concepts and strategies. Second, we
have partnered with Ivy Tech Community College to develop instructional
modules for design, digital manufacturing and virtual teaming. The
content is parallel to this project, and it is the intent of this
group to bring Ivy Tech in as a potential partner for future ATE
grants.
Posters:
- President Cordova visit pdf posters
- General PLM Posters:
- Professors:
- Graduate students
- Microsoft PowerPoint Poster Templates:
- PLM Center of Excellence template:
- MCCDE Poster template can be found here.
Some helpful files:
MCCDE Excel file (February
08 2008).
The files from Purdue meeting can be downloaded here.
All Syllabi from Product Design and Realization identified Purdue
COT courses can be downloaded here.
Conferences:
2007 ATE National Principal Investigators Conference
- MCCDE Poster template can be found here.
Meetings:
Upcoming meetings:
- Planning session at Sinclair Community College
- Planning session at Fox Valley Technical College
Past meetings :
- Planning session at Purdue University, September
19 - 21, 2007.
- The files from NSF Midwest Coalition for Comprehensive Design
Education meeting held at Purdue can be found on Teamcenter
Community in the folders: Documents and Lists: Shared Documents,
Curriculum Development, Guitar Project
- Planning session at Mott Community College,
May 21 – 22, 2007: Agenda
- Planning session at Butler County Community College
- March 28-30, 2007: Agenda
- Planning session at Purdue University - September
29, 2006: Results
|